Wednesday, May 29, 2019

One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest :: essays research papers fc

QUESTIONWas Forman compelled to change the point of view in his adaptation of One Flew everywhere the Cuckoos Nest?ANSWERForman was compelled to change the point of view in adapting the book into a film.REASONINGA.In the book Chief Bromdens thoughts go from relentless reality and understanding to dreams and visions which would be difficult for an earshot to follow.B.The confusion created by the Chiefs switches from reality to fantasy is possible in literary version due to the amount of concomitant and analysis, which can be put down on paper. However, this is impossible for a director to capture the same understanding and prescience in a two-hour film. C.Chief Bromdens thoughts and hallucinations, which are the narration in the book, are erratic and crazy when not compared and elaborated. In a film, it is not invariably possible to clarify on the type of details found in the book.D.There is not comme il faut time nor is it possible to elucidate into the amount of detail whic h Ken Kesey goes into in the book. This is due to the fact that Chief Bromden starts out playing deaf and dumb and even when he does begin to talk it is not in great amounts or details. In order to capture the heart of the story a director would have to use a broader narration, which a diverse audience could understand.E.A book allows for great amounts of details due to the depth of words and the imagery they can evoke in a readers mind. There is not enough time in a film for all the detail of a book to come out and explain every single character to an audience, which postulate to be constantly entertained to keep their focus.CITATIONSThis is an autobiographical reference to how Ken Kesey came to write One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest and the processes, which made it realistic and fantastical at the same time.But also at the same time Bromden is an unreliable witness he is also an extremely reliable one. We feel he tells us the uprightness about McMurphy in fact, he tells it with su ch penetration and insight that it has a consistent and coherent shape and meaning for us. The combination of hallucination and truth in the narration is a notable stylistic accomplishment. Fact and fantasy alternate, but the reader has no difficulty distinguishing one from the other, and thus they successfully balance each other.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.