Working Conditions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Working Conditions - Essay ExampleAccording to Andre and Manuel - thisprinciple holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the whiz that produces the greatest balance of benefits over harms for everyone affected (Andre, 2010).I absolutely agree in supporting the detailed recommendationsofHuman Rights Watchenlisted below (Compa, 2005). New federal and estate laws should reduce line speed in meat and poultry plants and establish new ergonomics standards to reduce repetitive stress injuries. Health and safety regime should apply stronger enforcement measures. States should develop stronger worker compensation laws and enforcement mechanisms. Employers should not engage in aggressive, intimidating anti-organizing campaigns that take advantage of loopholes and weaknesses in theU.S.labor law system. Congress should ordain legislation bringingU.S.labor law into compliance with international standards (e.g. to prohibit the permanent replacement of striking workers) and should also create stronger remedies for violations of workers rights. New laws and policies should ensure rate for the human rights of immigrant workers, whatever their legal status. Immigrants should guide the same workplace protections as non-immigrants, including coverage under fair labor standards and other labor laws, and the same remedies when their rights argon violated A hog worker fromNorth Carolinaquotes The line is so fast there is no time to sharpen the knife. The knife gets dull and you have to cut harder. Thats when you cut yourself. If a worker really loses limb or life, who is there to lend a helping hand to his family to earn free-and-easy living. Ethically, the employers should open their eyes and weigh the resulting benefits and harms of policies that areforced upon the workers in meat and poultry industry. Theincrease in volume and speed of productionshould be indorse with quality training and sufficient safeguards making the work less hazardous.Employe rs should choose the course of action that provides greatest benefits to theworkers who make up to 30,000 hard-cutting motions with sharp knives in a shift and often become victim of long-term occupational injuries and frequent lacerations. Investigations done by Human Rights Watch have shown that workers often do notreceive compensation for injuries at workplace because companies do not report injuries. The claims are delayed and denied reprisals areinflictedon workers who file them. Workers are lovedaslong asthey are healthy and capable of working like a dog. But once they get hurt,company will find a reason to fire them or putthem in a dangerous job or change the shift so that worker quits.Therefore, lot of raft just work with the pain without reporting their injuries.To overcome such situations, according to deontology, a right choice conforms to a moral norm. Such norms are do simply to be obeyed by each moral agent in spite of maximizing such norm-keepings .For deontologist s the Right has priority over the Good. If an action is not in accord with the Right, it may not be performed no matter the Good that it might (Alexander 2008).In an investigation conducted by Jamie Fellner, director of the U.S. Program at Human Rights Watch, the factrevealed was that often Public agencies try to protect consumers from tainted meat but do very little toprotect their workers fromunhealthy and terrible conditions. It is also reported that aggressive and unlawful company try to derail workers organizing efforts. Employers threat workers who try to defend themselves